Topics

On this page

Last updated on Apr 23, 2025

Sanity: API-first frontend flexibility

Sanity’s frontend approach is built around its API-first architecture, which separates content management from presentation. This design allows businesses to deliver content to websites, apps, and other platforms while keeping the structure consistent across all channels. But does this level of flexibility fit all business needs? Let’s break it down.

How Sanity’s APIs work

Sanity provides two main APIs: REST and GraphQL. These APIs let developers retrieve content and deliver it to the frontend without being tied to any specific design or template.


An online retailer using Sanity CMS can centralize product details like descriptions, prices, and images. These details can then be delivered to their website, mobile app, and in-store screens through the GraphQL API, ensuring consistency.

A WordPress alternative

Unlike Sanity, WordPress offers a more gradual approach. While it supports APIs like REST and WPGraphQL for headless CMS setups, businesses can also use its traditional CMS framework, making it an accessible alternative to Sanity CMS pricing and technical requirements. This flexibility positions WordPress as a more beginner-friendly option in the Sanity CMS alternative space.

This below query fetches posts with fields like id, title, and date. WPGraphQL makes it easy to customize and test queries with an intuitive visual interface.

Sanity vs WordPress WPGraphQL

Sanity’s API-driven model works well for:

This flexibility is appealing for businesses aiming to deliver content to multiple platforms. But achieving this often requires skilled developers to set up and maintain integrations, which can increase project costs and timelines.

Omnichannel content delivery

Sanity’s structured content makes it suitable for omnichannel delivery. A single content source can feed various platforms, ensuring updates are reflected everywhere. 


WordPress also supports omnichannel content delivery. With tools like REST API and WPGraphQL, businesses can achieve similar results without the need for extensive custom logic or development time. Its built-in themes and plugins can streamline omnichannel strategies, making it easier for non-technical teams to manage.

Challenges with Sanity’s approach

While Sanity offers powerful tools for custom frontend development, it comes with trade-offs:

Sanity’s API-first model is ideal for businesses that need complete control over their frontend and can allocate ongoing developer resources to maintain and evolve integrations. However, this comes with a higher setup and maintenance cost. In contrast, WordPress offers a lower total cost of ownership and a faster learning curve making it more attractive for teams that want to move quickly without heavy technical dependencies. 

Next, we’ll dive into how Sanity integrates with modern frameworks and compare it to WordPress’ approach to frontend flexibility.

Integration with modern frameworks

For enterprises managing multiple digital platforms, be it a website, mobile app, or in-store display consistent branding and messaging are critical. Integration with frameworks allows businesses to deliver content dynamically, ensuring that updates made in the CMS propagate across all touchpoints in real time.

For instance

While Sanity offers developer-focused flexibility, the reliance on skilled teams for these integrations could be a barrier for businesses with limited technical resources. In contrast, platforms like WordPress provide pre-built themes and plugins, lowering the entry threshold for such implementations.


Credits

Authored by Shreya Shreya Shreya Agarwal Growth Engineer